Define void using <$ (re #9827)

Authored by dfeuer on Nov 23 2014, 3:00 PM.

Description

Define void using <$ (re Trac #9827)

() <$ x is sometimes better than fmap (const ()) x and should
never be worse.

Reviewed By: ekmett

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D521

Details

Committed
hvrNov 23 2014, 3:02 PM
Pushed
bgamariAug 25 2016, 1:39 PM
Reviewer
ekmett
Differential Revision
D521: Define void using <$
Parents
rGHCDIFF96d29b5403bd: Call `popCountBigNat` directly (#9818)
Branches
Unknown
Tags
Unknown