Update more performance numbers due to stricter seqDmdType

Authored by nomeata.

Description

Update more performance numbers due to stricter seqDmdType

including T9675 itself. Maybe its memory behaviour is too spiky for
max_bytes_used and peak_megabytes_allocated to be used sensibly at all.

Details

Yuras added a subscriber: Yuras.Oct 13 2014, 12:40 PM
Yuras added inline comments.
/testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/all.T
184

Shouldn't it be equal to current value at line 174? (Sorry if my comment is irrelevant...)

nomeata added inline comments.Oct 13 2014, 1:57 PM
/testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/all.T
184

Quite right, thanks for looking! Luckily I accidentally fixed it with my next commit.

Ah, sorry, I was looking in the wrong place. Fix pushed. Thanks.