Note that the ambiguous case is untested, as infix declarations for record fields are broken. Furthermore, this might not even be an issue without the rest of OverloadedRecordFields.
- rGHC Glasgow Haskell Compiler
Lint Warnings Excuse: fy Severity Location Code Message Warning testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T11167.hs:14 TXT3 Line Too Long Warning testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T11167.hs:17 TXT3 Line Too Long Warning testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T11167_ambig.hs:16 TXT3 Line Too Long Warning testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T11167_ambig.hs:19 TXT3 Line Too Long
No Unit Test Coverage
- Build Status
Buildable 7229 Build 8687: GHC Patch Validation (amd64/Linux) Build 8686: arc lint + arc unit
Thanks for sorting this out, looks good to me. We want DuplicateRecordFields to be usable in isolation, so it is worth doing. I'll see if I can correct infix declarations for record fields and test the ambiguous case more thoroughly.